Herringbone Gears for Ultimaker Original Feeder
3.75:1 ratio Herringbone Gears (Alternative to 6.125 default ratio)3D printer parts and enhancements
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike
Commercial use is allowed, you must attribute the creator, you may remix this work and the remixed work should be made available under this license.
I made these gears to reduce the gear ratio for my Ultimaker. It makes the retractions completely silent when paired with SilentStepSticks stepper drivers (and operated at <20mm/s). Don't forget to change the Estep parameters in your Controller or firmware to 530.1 from 865.8. For best results print at <50 mm/s and turn on combing in retraction.
Materials and methods
Nothing extra, just filament of your choice
Issues are used to track todos, bugs or requests. To get started, you could create an issue.
I think yours is better - as simpler design
Hmm I thought about adding a standard ratio Herringbone gear set, but those already exist :)
- Printed on:
- Ultimaker - Ultimaker Original
- Good, although my little cog isn't as good as yours
- Good job. Perhaps you may consider doing a herringbone for the standard drive ratio for simplicity/ robustness?
Nope! There are normally four values which influences the step-width: the microstepping resolution (hardware, changeable by the jumpers on the mainboard), the e-steps/mm value (firmware!!! that means MARLIN for the UMO), the stepangle of the stepper motor itself (1.8° for the stock Stepper) and finally the ratio if the Stepper is geared.
To be exact:
You CAN also influence it by - e.g. the flow value - but that's not the "normal way".
To take it short: dont worry about your slicer
Thanks Ataraxis. If I were to use another slicer such as simplify 3d would it make any difference?
Using the ulticontroller: control -> Motion -> e-steps/mm
How do you change the estep parameters. I'm using a UMO with a heated bed and cura
Yep, exactly! Even after installing Silent step sticks, the feeder continued to be quite audible (51.3-51.7dB at 40 mm/s retraction). In order to reduce the noise I had to reduce retraction to below 10mm/s. By reducing the ratio I was able to boost that speed up to 20mm/s and continue to operate at a comfortable 29-31dB noise level.
Thanks for sharing your design! But tell me... why did you changed the ratio? For noise reasons?